Theatre Uncut
Theatre Uncut is a sort of theatre movement. Playwrights
from around the world contribute new, sort plays written in response to current
political situations. The plays have been performed by over 200 groups, in 17
countries. It’s great to hear about a group of theatre artists furthering
political theatre, and we applaud them.
But how much of a contribution are these playwrights
making? The plays chosen in 2012 can be produced free of royalties only during
the group’s “week of action”, which was in November of last year. A
royalty-free week is not a huge contribution from non-established playwrights
(although some are recognized). Many playwrights offer their work royalty-free
at any time. These playwrights merely submit their plays to Theatre Uncut
folks, who make them easily accessible on their website.
A few weeks ago, six Theatre Uncut plays were
presented off-off-Broadway with ultra-minimalist staging. This group will have
to come up with better material than this to make an impact on audiences. Most of
the plays were dramatically worthless. The playwrights have painfully obvious
political messages but little dramatic concern. The two monologues were
particularly brutal. A third play was hardly more than an exercise that might
have been passable in an improvisation class. A fourth – about a couple
purchasing a baby in a supermarket - exhibited a bit of cleverness at least,
but was as heavy-handed as the other three. It’s hard to see who’d pay
royalties for this work. The actors’ performances in did nothing to relieve the
pain.
The other two pieces managed to keep my attention.
Neil LaButes’ play, In the Beginning,
presented real, if simplistic, characters. A father and daughter discuss the
Occupy Movement – with insight on both sides. Of the six pieces, this was the
only real play. But the point is made
through conversation, not through dramatic action. The most solid performance
of the evening is given by Victor Slezak.
The most interesting piece of the evening was David
Greig’s Fragile. The one actor on
stage gives a respectable performance playing the only character of the evening
with depth or subtlety – a psychiatric patient confronting his social worker in
her home. No actress plays the social worker. Her lines are projected above the
stage, and read by the audience. The technique is undeveloped here, but it’s a
promising idea. It suggests a new way of relating to an audience,
simultaneously involving them and distancing the character. The final piece of
the evening, it was the only one exhibiting real creativity.
For all their faults, we have to applaud Theatre
Uncut. After all, how many companies open the floor to discussion after the
performance? Let’s hope to see them again – and let’s see what other material
they have.